Memorandum

To:Robert Garton, Chairperson, Legislative Council
From:Pete Baxter, Chairman, Indiana State School Bus Committee
Re:School Bus Warning Lamp Study - Public Law 89-1999 PDF
Date:October 25, 1999

 

The 1999 Indiana General Assembly enacted P.L. 89-1999, authored by Representative Susan Crosby, directing the State School Bus Committee to review the existing state and federal requirements for the display of flashing yellow and red signal lamps by a school bus when coming to a stop to load or unload children. The State School Bus Committee was to evaluate whether the existing requirements are adequate to ensure children's safety or whether children's safety could be improved by requiring the earlier display of the flashing red signal lamps. In addition, the State School Bus Committee was to determine the feasibility of amending state laws and rules for requesting a change in federal regulations to require the earlier display of the flashing red signal lamps.

The study is attached for the Legislative Council's review. Summarized below are the main conclusions in the study.

  • The State School Bus Committee believes the existing configuration and operation of yellow and red warning lamps used by a school bus to take on or discharge children provides more than adequate protection to children at bus stops. Highway users depend on the uniformity and consistency of messages, from traffic control devices, to aid in safe vehicle operation. Flashing yellow and red lamps have established well understood messages. It is common knowledge that the color yellow means caution and the color red means stop. The universal message of these colors is consistent; whether the lamp is part of a traffic control device (e.g., railroad crossing signal, a traffic light, or intersection flasher) or equipment on a vehicle (e.g., automobile 4-way hazard lights, fire truck, police car, school bus).
  • There is no data to support the belief that motorists will take the authority of the school bus more seriously if the red flasher lights were activated earlier. However, we believe permitting earlier activation of the red lights is certain to decrease student safety at bus stops.
  • Upon observing the yellow warning lamps, some motorists use this as an opportunity to speed up to avoid stopping for the bus. This is identical to their behavior when encountering the yellow signal on the traffic light. Rhetorically speaking, why should we expect different behavior near a school bus? It is unrealistic to expect that equipment alone is the solution to improving student safety, when the larger issue is highway user behavior. Modifying the highway user's behavior is better accomplished through education, public service information, increased enforcement of existing school bus stop laws, continuous evaluation of school bus routes, and bus stop selection.

We believe the following countermeasures have merit in improving student safety at bus stops:

  • Create and disseminate public service announcements for television, radio, and newspaper markets to educate highway users about the school bus stop law.
  • Identify best practices and recommend that school districts establish safe school bus routes and stops.
  • Design enforcement blitzes of the school bus stop law by law enforcement agencies.
  • Implement student safety programs pertaining to loading zone safety and best practices at bus stops.

If further assistance is necessary please feel free to contact me by e-mail to pbaxter@doe.in.gov or by telephone at 317-232-0891.

Attachment

c: Honorable Susan Crosby, State Representative

State School Bus Committee